Cap Reform Blog

Crunch week for CAP

| 1 Comment

There will be more than one crunch week for the CAP between now and the summer, and this week could be one of them.

On Thursday and Friday the leaders of the Member State governments will assemble as the European Council, under the chairmanship of Herman Van Rompuy, for the summit meeting at which the EU budget for 2014-2020 could be decided.

At this stage we can’t, of course, know what will be decided. But I thought I’d look back at the numbers from the previous attempt, last November, to see if we can glean any clues.

The initial Commission proposal, dating back to 2011, was essentially to hold the CAP budget in cash terms, meaning that in real terms its value would decline over the seven-year period by about 10%. Before last November’s summit meeting the then EU Presidency, Cyprus, tabled a text which reduced the EU budget a bit, because of pressure from (some) member states; on the CAP, it held the Pillar 2 total but shaved about €4bn off the 7-year total for Pillar 1.

Then during the November summit Van Rompuy tabled two texts. The first version reduced Pillar 1 by a further €7bn or so, and Pillar 2 by about the same. But the response from member states must have been that this was a step too far for Pillar 1, because his second version essentially reinstated Pillar 1 back at about the Cyprus Presidency’s level.

Confused? Me too. In any case, what does this tell us about the prospects for this week? The word in the corridors is that Mr Van R is now close to having a proposal that stands a chance of being agreed; and that, whilst the CAP could be subject to some further changes, it isn’t being specifically targeted. We can also probably say with a degree of certainty that, given the difference between his first and second texts from November, member states would be unlikely now to agree a final deal with a big further cut in Pillar 1.

Anyway, by Friday night we may know for certain. I certainly hope so, because the rest of the CAP reform timetable is depending on it.

One Comment

  1. avatar

    “Confused” seems to sum up the negotiations over CAP. Subsidies are crucial for the industry and the long drawn out nature of the negotiations is a concern for farmers who need security going forward. It seems certain that payments will not go up and most likely will go down, but by how much?

    The other concern is the amount of legislative record keeping required. With farmers already spending more time than ever keeping a vast array of records they fear that more legislation to make the CAP “greener, fairer and more sustainable” will lead to more time spend filling in forms and less time spent farming.

    Hopefully the Pillar 1 budget will not be reduced and paper work kept down but this whole process has been impossible to predict thus far.

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.

*